Circular Velvet and Cut Velvet: Scientific Analysis and Application Cognition of Two Velvet Structures

In the field of textile technology and materials science, the suede structure on the surface of floor mats is a key technological path to achieve different functional characteristics. Circle velvet and cut velvet are two fundamentally different velvet processing techniques, and their differences are rooted in the microstructure and extend to the macroscopic performance. Understanding the essential differences between these two structures can help form accurate expectations of product performance.

1、 Process principle and structural form

The formation of the looped structure is achieved by implanting continuous yarns in the form of uncut coils into the base fabric substrate and fixing them with adhesive backing. Each coil maintains a complete closed-loop state, forming uniformly distributed circular protrusions on the surface. This structure presents a continuous linear topology.

The cutting structure adds a cutting process on the basis of the looped velvet process. After the coil is implanted and fixed, place its top curved part under the cutting tool, so that each coil is cut open to form two independent upright clusters. Therefore, the cut velvet surface is an array composed of countless discrete, top open fiber bundles.

2、 Derivative differences in physical properties

Starting from the above infrastructure, it can be logically deduced that the two have performance differentiation in multiple aspects:

(1) Mechanical properties and durability

• Velvet: Its closed-loop structure has better structural stability and deformation resistance. When external force is applied, stress is transmitted and dispersed along the coil, making it more resistant to indentation and more suitable for withstanding heavy static pressure or high-frequency trampling wear.

• Cutting velvet: Upright velvet clusters are prone to lodging when subjected to vertical pressure, resulting in temporary visual indentation. After the top of the pile is cut, the fiber ends are exposed, and under long-term high-intensity friction, there may be a more obvious fraying phenomenon of the end fibers than the looped pile.

(2) Sensory characteristics and optical effects

• Velvet: It has a relatively solid and elastic texture. Light produces diffuse reflection on its curved surface, visually presenting a uniform color tone and understated texture, tending to present a matte or soft glossy effect.

• Cutting velvet: Soft and plump to the touch. Light produces mirror reflection at the top cross-section of numerous upright fibers, which gives them a more vivid, saturated color rendering and velvet like luster, with richer color layers.

(3) Cleaning and Maintenance Behavior

• Velvet: Stain particles are easily trapped in the grooves between the coils, possessing the initial "dirt hiding" characteristic. Thoroughly cleaning requires the use of bristles or high suction to penetrate deep into the gaps.

• Cutting fluff: Dust and fine debris usually float at the top of the fluff clusters, making daily vacuuming more efficient. Liquid stains may penetrate down fibers faster due to capillary action.

3、 The basic logic of scene adaptability

There is no absolute superiority or inferiority between the two structures, and their applicability depends on the preset environmental conditions and functional priorities:

(1)Tend to choose environments with looped velvet:

• Areas with significant static pressure (such as long-term placement points on furniture legs).

• Transition spaces that require higher friction coefficients to enhance safety, such as entrances and exits, slopes.

• Public places that aim to reduce cleaning frequency or immediate visibility of stains.

(2)Tend to choose environments for shearing:

• A resting area with clear requirements for tactile comfort.

• A visually dominant space designed to create a warm, tranquil, or luxurious atmosphere.

• A place where personnel activities are relatively gentle, mainly polluted by dust, and convenient for daily vacuuming and maintenance.

4、 Construction of selection logic

The final choice should start with defining the "main contradiction" in the application scenario: whether to prioritize long-term physical wear resistance (looped velvet) or to prioritize immediate sensory comfort and visual expression (cut velvet). At the same time, it is necessary to comprehensively evaluate the pollution type, cleaning cycle, and maintenance capability in this scenario.

Understanding the difference between looped velvet and cut velvet is the beginning of going beyond marketing terminology and directly discussing the essence of the product. These two processes represent different focuses on functionality and aesthetics, providing clear technical options for space designers and product users.